Skip to main content
Menu

⚠️ Risk Warning: Trading forex, CFDs, and cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors. This platform provides educational content only and does not constitute financial advice.

◎ Level 3 · Intermediate Blockchain & Networks Scaling

Layer 1 Blockchains

Learn what Layer 1 blockchains are, how base-layer execution and consensus work, and the trade-offs involved in scaling a blockchain at the protocol level.

Progress 0%

Reading progress — saved on this device

BLOCKCHAIN & NETWORKS · SCALING

A Layer 1 (L1) is the base blockchain itself: the network whose own validators or miners order transactions, enforce protocol rules and provide the canonical ledger.

Learning objective: understand where this scaling approach sits in a blockchain stack, what it improves, what security assumptions it introduces, and why those trade-offs matter to users and traders.

The core idea

An L1 is the foundational settlement and consensus network. Bitcoin and Ethereum are familiar examples, but different L1s make different choices about block size, block time, validator requirements, execution design and data availability.

Execution
Transactions and smart-contract calls are processed according to the base protocol.
Consensus
Miners or validators agree on the canonical state.
Settlement
The L1 is the final reference point for ownership and state.
Data availability
The network makes the data needed to verify state transitions available under its protocol rules.

How L1 scaling works

An L1 can increase capacity by changing the base protocol itself. Examples include improving data throughput, changing block parameters, parallelising execution, improving state management, or introducing new data-availability techniques.

ApproachPotential benefitTrade-off to examine
Larger or more frequent blocksMore transactions per unit of timeHigher bandwidth/storage demands can make nodes harder to run
Execution optimisationHigher compute throughputComplexity and hardware requirements
Data-availability upgradesMore room for rollup data or transactionsProtocol complexity and implementation risk
Parallel executionGreater throughput for independent workloadsMore complex state-conflict handling

The scalability trilemma

Blockchain design is often framed as a balance between scalability, security and decentralisation. The framing is simplified, but useful: raising throughput by demanding expensive hardware may reduce the number of people able to validate the chain; keeping validation accessible can constrain raw throughput.

Practical point: headline transactions-per-second figures are not enough. Ask what hardware a validating node needs, how many independent validators exist, how state is verified and what happens under congestion.

Why it matters to a trader or user

  • Fees: base-layer congestion can make transfers and DeFi activity expensive.
  • Finality: settlement speed affects when deposits or withdrawals are treated as complete.
  • Exchange operations: venues may pause deposits/withdrawals during upgrades or instability.
  • Token economics: some L1 tokens are used for fees, staking and security, linking network usage to token demand — but not guaranteeing value appreciation.

Quick checkpoint

  1. What problem is this mechanism trying to solve?
  2. Where does execution happen and where does settlement or finality come from?
  3. Which new operational, bridge, sequencing or consensus risks appear?

Common misunderstandings

  • Cheaper does not automatically mean safer. Lower fees can come with different trust, bridge, sequencer or validator assumptions.
  • “Scaling” is not one technology. L1 upgrades, L2 rollups and sidechains solve throughput constraints in different ways.
  • Token price and network quality are separate questions. A technically strong network can still have poor token economics, and the reverse can also be true.

FAQ

Is every blockchain a Layer 1?

No. A Layer 1 is the base chain. Rollups and other networks can operate above or alongside an L1 and may rely on it to varying degrees.

Does a faster L1 automatically beat Layer 2s?

No. Speed is only one dimension. Security assumptions, decentralisation, data availability, ecosystem depth and application compatibility also matter.

Can an L1 use L2s as well?

Yes. A base layer can improve itself while also supporting higher-layer scaling systems.

Summary

The useful question is not simply whether a network is “fast”. Compare execution, settlement, data availability, consensus, bridge design and operational maturity. Those layers determine how a scaling system behaves when conditions are normal — and when something goes wrong.

Risk note: Crypto networks, bridges and smart contracts can fail, be exploited or become congested. Network design does not remove market, custody or counterparty risk. This material is educational only and is not investment advice.

Last reviewed: 20 August 2026

BUILD YOUR OWN PATH

Want this in a personalised order?

Take the crypto assessment and get a custom path of 10 modules matched to what you already know. Free, no card required.

Build my path →